Our Smartphone Network: BlackBerryWindows MobileAndroidPalm Pre
iPhone Forums
EverythingiCafe iPhone cases, accessories iPhone Social iPhone Wallpapers iPhone forums iPhone blog iPhone accessory reviews iPhone news

Go Back   iPhone Forums > Apple iPhone > iPhone




Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-13-2007, 09:27 PM   #21 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 44
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I looked before and after.

1.1.1: 400

1.1.2: 412

They bumped the bus speed by 3 MHZ, which means a 12 MHz bump in the CPU speed.
ebp2kEM1 is offline  
Digg this Post!Share on Facebook!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2007, 10:11 PM   #22 (permalink)
 
Swagger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Posts: 2,169
Thanks: 205
Thanked 132 Times in 105 Posts
Smile

Originally Posted by Tinman View Post
I also found a site that debunked the 600 MHz claim. Don't have it handy, but there are several out there.

For the record I can indeed stress the CPU (via multiple SSH sessions, all running tasks), but it never goes above 412 MHz (just as it never went past 400 MHz under 1.1.1). It also never drops below 412 MHz.

So, again, I am 90+% convinced Apple increased the clock speed in 1.1.2. It also doesn't seem like they are using CPU scaling in the iPhone at this time.


BTW: There is a lot of doubt the CPU is spec'd to 600 MHz. What I am saying is, even if 600 MHz is true (which I doubt) Apple capped to a lower speed to save battery life. This could be how they magically increased battery life a month before the device hit the streets. And, for some reason, they have increased it (a little) in 1.1.2.



--
Mike
Mike,
To add more fact to your claim. I have noticed here and in other forums. iPhone users are reporting faster battery drains, after updating to 1.1.2. Once again you have found the elusive answer to the question...M
__________________
Constantly having to be tethered to a charger is NOT MOBILE in my opinion (I.e., iPhone 3GS battery).
Swagger is offline  
Digg this Post!Share on Facebook!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2007, 02:06 PM   #23 (permalink)
 
Hondamaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Sidney, OHIO
Posts: 5,185
Thanks: 389
Thanked 233 Times in 182 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by iPhonian View Post
Mike,
To add more fact to your claim. I have noticed here and in other forums. iPhone users are reporting faster battery drains, after updating to 1.1.2. Once again you have found the elusive answer to the question...M
I wonder...is that a good trade-off? Faster clock for shorter battery life. Is it worth even upgrading to 112? What do we get with that update besides multi-language w/keyboard?
Hondamaker is offline  
Digg this Post!Share on Facebook!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2007, 02:16 PM   #24 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 44
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I haven't noticed any significant decrease in battery life. Ive been on 1.1.2 for three days now.

It also isn't a whole lot faster - so it shouldn't be a huge drain on the battery.
ebp2kEM1 is offline  
Digg this Post!Share on Facebook!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2007, 02:21 PM   #25 (permalink)
 
wrhutch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Pottsboro Texas
Posts: 498
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ebp2kEM1 View Post
I haven't noticed any significant decrease in battery life. Ive been on 1.1.2 for three days now.

It also isn't a whole lot faster - so it shouldn't be a huge drain on the battery.
Same here. Good so far but not as good as I had hoped for.
wrhutch is offline  
Digg this Post!Share on Facebook!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2007, 02:25 PM   #26 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
psylichon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Philly
Posts: 10,830
Thanks: 443
Thanked 989 Times in 687 Posts
Default

My battery life also seems no different.
psylichon is offline  
Digg this Post!Share on Facebook!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2007, 10:28 PM   #27 (permalink)
 
Velodog2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 365
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Is it reasonable to expect to notice a difference of a 3% faster clock in either application speed or battery drain? Interesting that they did it, but why bother?
Velodog2 is offline  
Digg this Post!Share on Facebook!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2007, 02:26 PM   #28 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 21
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I am on 1.1.1

400.00MHz
100.00MHz
Gom33 is offline  
Digg this Post!Share on Facebook!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2007, 02:34 PM   #29 (permalink)
 
Tinman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Aridzona
Posts: 3,004
Thanks: 45
Thanked 117 Times in 73 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Velodog2 View Post
Is it reasonable to expect to notice a difference of a 3% faster clock in either application speed or battery drain? Interesting that they did it, but why bother?
Every little bit helps and so far 1.1.2 is indeed snappy for me.

It is becoming obvious that a change in CPU speed did indeed occur with 1.1.2.

Haven't noticed any less battery life, but that has always varied (depending upon usage).

More importantly, to me, is that this bodes well for a possible future over/under clocking utility. Lower speed to save battery (say 200 MHz), higher for CPU-intensive apps (games, etc.).



--
Mike
__________________
"When this sign is under water, this road is impassable. -posted on a Tennessee highway



Tinman is offline  
Digg this Post!Share on Facebook!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2007, 10:12 PM   #30 (permalink)
 
iLLGT2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NY/LI
Posts: 218
Thanks: 6
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Tinman View Post
Every little bit helps and so far 1.1.2 is indeed snappy for me.

It is becoming obvious that a change in CPU speed did indeed occur with 1.1.2.

Haven't noticed any less battery life, but that has always varied (depending upon usage).

More importantly, to me, is that this bodes well for a possible future over/under clocking utility. Lower speed to save battery (say 200 MHz), higher for CPU-intensive apps (games, etc.).



--
Mike
Agreed... My 1.1.1 phone was always quick compared to newer versions of the iPhone, i have one of the originals, now with 1.1.2 its blazing quick!

Anyone else notice how much faster wifi runs as well?
iLLGT2 is offline  
Digg this Post!Share on Facebook!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Integrated by BBpixel