 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
02-16-2009, 09:22 PM
|
#101 (permalink) |
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: So Cal
Posts: 1,692
Thanks: 52
Thanked 42 Times in 38 Posts
|
I hope the next iPhone has the same specs as the Samsung Omnia HD!
http://infotainment.samsungmobile.com/
__________________
-Josh |
|
  
|
|
02-16-2009, 09:39 PM
|
#102 (permalink) |
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Bama
Posts: 3,233
Thanks: 129
Thanked 106 Times in 60 Posts
|
Originally Posted by monkeysrock0622
Yea, those are some very nice specs.
What bugs me about it though is, will these new super smartphones being announced this week at MWC with all these great features and all these new powerful, beefy processors ever be released in the USA? Not that I'm gonna get one, I'm still gunning for the iPhone regardless but, sure they will compete with the iPhone in other countries no doubt but ya know, we don't see many of the phones that the rest of the world sees over here except through magazines and online. Besides, if they do make it stateside, unless a carrier over here picks them up and subsidizes the price then we'll just see them at Best Buy for $8-900 which in that case, how would that be in direct competition with the iPhone? I dunno...I just wonder how many of these newly announced phones this week we'll see over here on AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile and/or Sprint.
__________________
= White 32GB iPhone 3GS =
|
|
|
|
|
02-17-2009, 12:51 AM
|
#104 (permalink) |
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Location Location
Posts: 8,748
Thanks: 93
Thanked 509 Times in 408 Posts
|
the only one of those i really like is the one with iChat. That one looks glorious, imo.
__________________
words and wisdom from life behind the kit |
|
|
|
|
02-17-2009, 12:55 AM
|
#105 (permalink) |
|
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Philly
Posts: 10,783
Thanks: 442
Thanked 983 Times in 682 Posts
|
Originally Posted by acosmichippo
I agree... the only revision I would consider worthy. But, alas, it is unrealistic at this time.
|
|
|
|
|
02-17-2009, 01:07 AM
|
#106 (permalink) |
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Location Location
Posts: 8,748
Thanks: 93
Thanked 509 Times in 408 Posts
|
the thinness, yes... but the aesthetic appeal is quite feasible.
__________________
words and wisdom from life behind the kit |
|
|
|
|
02-17-2009, 01:34 AM
|
#107 (permalink) |
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: So Cal
Posts: 1,692
Thanks: 52
Thanked 42 Times in 38 Posts
|
I think it looks too much like the iPod Classic. If Apple were to make the iPhone look like one of their other products, it would make more sense to make it look like the iPod nano or the iMac/MacBook (unibody)
|
|
|
|
|
02-17-2009, 01:43 AM
|
#108 (permalink) |
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Location Location
Posts: 8,748
Thanks: 93
Thanked 509 Times in 408 Posts
|
why would that make more sense?
__________________
words and wisdom from life behind the kit |
|
|
|
|
02-17-2009, 02:02 AM
|
#109 (permalink) |
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: So Cal
Posts: 1,692
Thanks: 52
Thanked 42 Times in 38 Posts
|
The nano, because it's the more popular and better selling iPod (right?)
The iMac, because they have made (almost) all of their computers to look the same now, so they might start bringing in the little things like the iPods/iPhone. Either that I just don't like the look of the classic as much as the other things lol |
|
|
|
|
02-17-2009, 09:23 PM
|
#110 (permalink) |
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Bama
Posts: 3,233
Thanks: 129
Thanked 106 Times in 60 Posts
|
Check out what Acer will be bringing into "the game" later this year...
http://www.intomobile.com/2009/02/17...ne-lineup.html These phones look pretty nice. Not a big WinMo fan though.
__________________
= White 32GB iPhone 3GS =
|
|
|
|
 |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:05 AM.
