View Single Post
Old 03-09-2008, 04:09 PM   #23 (permalink)
geordisjd
 
geordisjd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,690
Thanks: 40
Thanked 34 Times in 28 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by x999x View Post
I don't recall any of the ladies posted being nude or exposing their pubic hair.

Furthermore the thread titles were never misleading. You don't want to see scantily clad women, don't click threads titled "JESSICA ALBA WALLPAPERS."

Why not make a thread called "PEOPLE GOTTA EAT TOO!" and post screen captures of 2girls1cup, or TubGirl...

Bottom line, I don't need to see this **** when I view a thread, and its clear the OP did this intentionally. 3 pages of comments is proof in the pudding.

Time to try out this ignore feature.
What kind of prude are you, x999x? First I don't see any pubic hair.
2nd, most scantily clothed ladies (in sexually suggestive poses, which is what annoys me on these boards, not Jessica Alba) appear in threads without warning (see the link I provided yesterday, it has been there since November). 3rd, as a gynecologist, I can attest that female pubic hair has just about disappeared, meaning that the said ladies wear bikinis that are so low that they might as well wear nothing.
Yes, I wanted to make a point, and I should have a right to. I didn't name the thread "for women only", because I wanted guys to look at this and see what kind of effect suddenly finding a woman licking her bosom on a thread that has nothing to do with it can have on posters that happen to be female.
I can't believe that in the 21st century there are still people like you that have such a double standard for the sexes.
I sure hope that when some almost-naked female pic appears on any thread in the future, you will be the first to criticize the poster (yeah, right...).
__________________
Too Many Macs To Count
4 or 5 iPods
1 iPhone (iPhone 3G by now)

taH pagh taHbe' net SaHtaH !
geordisjd is offline   Reply With Quote