App Store Folies: Adding Insult To Removal

The fallout from Apple’s decision to remove all Google Voice apps continues today, with independant developer Riverturn trying explain the unexplainable that is Apple’s removal of these apps. AT&T was once again conveniently pinned as the fall guy, as they were for the SlingPlayer Mobile fiasco. Ultimately, this is Apple’s storefront and they are responsible for what’s available or not available on the virtual shelves. Not only are consumers deprived of truly useful apps, but it also impacts companies such as Riverturn, who invest heavily into the development of apps. This is not a lower level management decision, but you would think it was given the non-response from Apple, when rightly contacted by the developer of VoiceCentral. Repeated emails going unanswered by Apple, but at least they left a voicemail. The developers at Riverturn were finally able to discuss the removal with Richard from Apple and the conversation went something like this:

Richard: “I’m calling to let you know that VoiceCentral has been removed from the App Store because it duplicates features of the iPhone.”

Me: “I don’t understand that reasoning. By that logic wouldn’t apps like Textfree, Skype, fring, or iCall be considered duplicates?”

Richard: “I can’t discuss other apps with you.”

Me: “It’s not the apps themselves I want to discuss just the lack of consistency in rule enforcement.”

Richard: “I can only say that yours duplicates features of the iPhone and was causing confusion in the user community. It’s against our policy.”

Me: “So what has changed that it is now against policy?It has been in the store for the last 4 months with no problem.There wasn’t a problem for the 1.5 months prior to that when you were ‘reviewing’ it.And this didn’t come up with any of the updates we submitted after it was already in the store.”

Richard: “I can’t say – only that yours is not complying with our policy.”

Me: “Can you tell me what portions of the app were duplicate features?”

Richard: “I can’t go into granular detail.”

Me: “Is there something we can change or alter in order to regain compliance and get back in the Store?”

Richard: “I can’t say.”

Me: “Well if we can’t figure out the issue then how will we know whether to resubmit the app.And how will we know whether to invest in any other development efforts? Future apps could be impacted.”

Richard: “I can’t help you with that”

Me: “So how do we know whether it is still viable for us to consider Apple a partner if this is how the scenario plays out.If you were in my shoes would you continue to invest blood, sweat, tears and money in something that can be killed off at any moment without your say so?”

Richard: “I understand your point but I can’t help you with that.”

Me: “Surely someone there at Apple asked you to make this phone call.Can I speak with that person about this?”

Richard: “I am the only one you can speak with on this subject.”

Me: “There has to be someone there I can actually have a back and forth with so that we can make some strategic decisions on whether this partnership makes any sense.”

Richard: “You can only talk to me”

Me:“Nothing personal since I know you have just been tasked to make this call but we aren’t really talking here. There’s no back and forth and you aren’t allowed to answer any questions. Can I implore you to ask your managers if there is anyone who would be willing to speak with me and have a real conversation?I don’t care if it needs to be off the record or we need to sign another top-secret NDA but we really have nothing to go on at this point.We will need to make business decisions on whether it makes any sense to continue developing.”

Richard: “I will relay that to my managers.”

It’s understandable that AT&T is looking out for their business, but it’s Apple who should be looking out for developers and ultimately their consumers. In our estimation, they’ve failed on both counts. They control what happens in their App Store. We all know why these apps were removed, yet we’re supposed to believe it’s because “it duplicates features of the iPhone“.

We’re all for the secrecy that shrouds new products, but generic responses that attempt to defend an indefensible App Store policy is making them more like the company that resides in Redmond or perhaps even worse.

[Riverturn via Daring Fireball]

  • Swagger

    Just another great App that enters the Jailbreaking arena. Apple is going to continue with there foolishness and end up having every iPhone in the world being Jailbroken. Mark

  • Swagger

    Just another great App that enters the Jailbreaking arena. Apple is going to continue with their foolishness and end up having every iPhone in the world being Jailbroken. As well as every worthwhile App ending up in Cydia or some other repository. Mark

  • BBQ Jones

    Can someone point me in the right direction to perform a jailbreak on my phone? TIA!

  • The Apple

    This is not a very professional move by Apple. As an Apple customer I am very disappointed in some of their business practices. Apple should stop playing app God, and start trying to take the viewpoint of developers and consumers. If they cannot properly properly screen the apps before they release them, they should eat their mistakes.

  • evolution83

    Lord…Apple just doesn’t get it. If this BS continues to happen, developers will slowly cease from developing for Apple, since just about everything developers do is “against policy.”

    Apple can eat shit.

  • TwiPhone.com

    Well, well. Being an Apple custmer since 1984 – and a very happy one – I have to admit they are now constantly changing in a bad direction. All I said about Microsoft in the 90s now applies to Apple. First time I have to say they are using a Monopol EXACTLY the same way Microsoft did. Bad, bad, Steve. Please change it.

  • ion

    Why doesn’t google remove Apple,OSX,MacOSX,iMac,MacBook (company not fruit) from all its search results and create a blockade on these seriously ill policies of apple?

    Come on google, you know this will be forgiven, ask the community, its been to long of apple inappropriate behavior.

  • ion

    Or if not removing, for every search result, apple related, present a tool-tip with all the miss practices and misbehavior of apple

  • Hawk

    I really hate to say it, but it is moves like this that are going to push great developers away from the iPhone and start developing for the competition. Next thing you know, the iPhone WILL become like the Razr, and there will be another touch-screen phone out there that will have what people want.

    Right now, I don’t care who’s behind it, but someone is “choking the balls off the bull” so to speak.

  • photobyace

    This was my one fear with getting the iPhone that Apple would start doing these type of things. Apple still hasn’t figured out that people like to do things and while the phone is cook, it’s the apps that make the phone. Once they scare off all the developers ,it’s going to be the 90’s all over for Apple. The iPhone will have three apps meanwhile Google’s phone which has no restrictions will have thousands. Talk about shooting yourself in the foot twice.

  • RayCon

    Pathetic. I feel like stealing something from the Apple Store, selling it, and sending the money to the developer for all their wasted effort. But first I need to gather my Merry Men. Ah, seriously, my respect for Apple dropped a notch or two.

  • minivini

    The whole app store “process” has an aire of randomness in it’s selection process. The fact that they’ve pulled a Google app and subsequently treated the developer with complete disregard tells me that it’s an intentional snub more than Apple playing “God”. Apple has always made efforts to keep it’s products isolated from the “lowest common denominator”, and the app store has been the closest this company has come to embracing the mainstream. Maybe they now feel it’s time to separate from Google since they are the force behind Android – potentially the iPhone’s toughest long term competition. This is not altogether unlike the perceived logic in breaking the Palm Pre’s iTunes connection. Even though it’s ability to sync opened the door for more iTunes sales, it also helped bolster their competition. I think the Pre is in for a long term tit-for-tat with Apple over this one.

    In a real sense, Google is in a competitive arena with Apple just like Palm. It’ll be interesting to see how much hassle Google gets as it updates more apps like Google Earth, etc. Obviously this just speculation, so hopefully I’m wrong…